The author suggests using consistent terminology to avoid confusion. To improve clarity, the author proposes incorporating definitions from the Michigan Right to Farm Act 93 of 1981, specifically referencing "Farm" and "Farm Operation." Alternatively, if the original language is preferred, the author recommends explicitly defining "Commercial Farming Activity" and "Commercial Agricultural Use" within the document.
Further comments address specific sections, including III B.10, where the potential requirement for landscaping, screening, or buffering is acknowledged. Operational limitations, specifically item III C.6. concerning worker stays, raise questions about fees, additional regulations, and monitoring responsibilities. Similarly, item III C.7. regarding the maximum number of guests, prompts a consideration of defining "guests" and setting time restrictions for non-camper visitors.
Finally, submittal requirements outlined in III D. 3. G and K are reviewed. The author highlights the need for clarification regarding refuse management, including recycling, and the scope of measures to prevent trespassing, specifically asking whether the measures apply to campers or non-camper guests. The author commends the overall effort.