https://www.leelanau.gov/
This document presents a detailed analysis and critique of the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election, asserting that Joe Biden’s victory was fraudulent. The author argues that various anomalies and statistical improbabilities suggest the election was stolen from Donald Trump. Key points include the unexpected performance of Trump among certain demographic groups and significant drops in Biden’s support.
This document presents the proposed budget for Leelanau County’s indigent defense services for Fiscal Year 2025, with a total of $383,778.60, an increase from FY24’s $291,476.50. The rise in attorney compensation is due to a recalculation of case loads and adherence to the Michigan Indigent Defense Commission’s mandatory minimum hourly rate.
This document outlines the agenda for the Leelanau County Board of Commissioners meeting scheduled for April 9, 2024. The meeting will cover updates from various departments and includes action items such as approving recognition events, reviewing the 911 surcharge, considering technology requests, and discussing financial matters, including vehicle disposal and budget amendments.
The meeting, called to order by Chairman Ty Wessell, began with the approval of the amended agenda, including the placement of the Northwest Regional Airport Authority (NRAA) agenda item as an action item. Administrator Allen provided updates, introduced new staff, and discussed upcoming events and communications. Interim Administrator Richard Lewis was also introduced.
The annual Kids Fishing Day event attracted around 600 attendees, despite challenges like a 40% increase in bluegill costs. Volunteer turnout improved on the event day, and support from local organizations was crucial. While bluegills were less active, activities like fish painting and turtle gazing ensured a fun experience, highlighting the park’s accessibility for all.
The document is a letter addressed to the Leelanau County Commissioners from Alison Heins, expressing significant concern regarding Sheriff Borkovich’s appearance at a recent Donald Trump rally. Heins highlights the troubling nature of the sheriff’s association with inflammatory rhetoric, particularly a sign that depicted a “bloodbath,” which she vehemently disputes as a factual narrative surrounding President Biden.
Sarah Johnson, a concerned citizen of Leelanau County, has written to the Commissioners expressing worries about the Sheriff’s conduct at a rally with former President Trump. She seeks assurances that taxpayer resources were not used. Johnson emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability, arguing that any misuse of public funds would necessitate disciplinary measures or resignation.
Maryann Barnes expresses her concerns about Sheriff Michael Borkovich’s participation in an event while in uniform, implying he misrepresented Leelanau County’s views. She questions the use of county resources for political endorsements and critiques misinformation propagated by the former president, stressing the importance of ethics and professionalism in public service representation.
Sheriff Mike Borkovic’s public endorsement of a political candidate while in uniform has raised concerns about a potential violation of the Hatch Act. Paula Jo Kemler emphasizes that his decision to support candidate Trump is inappropriate, as it blurs the lines between personal views and professional responsibilities, undermining public trust in law enforcement.
Concern over the sheriff of Leelanau County has risen after he was seen at a rally supporting former President Trump. Questions have been raised about the use of county resources for this trip, including whether taxpayers covered expenses. The author, Diane Foerster, seeks ways to prevent future political actions by sheriff’s officials.
