Regular meeting (Public Comment – Bill Wiesner, 4/16/2024)

This document presents a detailed analysis and critique of the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election, asserting that Joe Biden’s victory was fraudulent. The author argues that various anomalies and statistical improbabilities suggest that the election was stolen from Donald Trump. Key points include the unexpected performance of Trump among certain demographic groups, such as rural male working-class whites and a significant drop in Biden’s support among black voters nationally. The document also highlights the unusual voting patterns in specific cities like Detroit, Philadelphia, and Milwaukee, where Biden’s margins were derived almost entirely from black votes, which the author finds highly suspicious.

The document further delves into the discrepancies between polling data and other non-polling metrics, such as party registration trends, candidate enthusiasm, and social media followings, all of which predicted a Trump victory. The author claims that for Biden to win, every non-polling metric would have had to be wrong simultaneously, an outcome deemed extremely unlikely. Additionally, the document lists several alleged irregularities in the vote counting process, including late-arriving ballots with impossible postal return dates, the failure to match signatures on mail-in ballots, missing votes, and non-resident voters casting ballots.

The author concludes that the evidence presented points to a stolen election, with the vote totals from Detroit, Philadelphia, and Milwaukee being pivotal in securing Biden’s victory in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The document suggests that these irregularities were not mere human errors but part of a larger scheme to manipulate the election results. The tone of the document is highly skeptical of the election’s legitimacy, asserting that only those who benefited from the alleged fraud, namely Democrats and the liberal media, believe Biden won fairly.