Committee Meeting(Committee of the Whole (Governance Workshop)):2/8/2024 (Public Comment – B. Wiesner, 2/8/2024)

**Executive Summary**

**Introduction**
The document discusses the controversial aspects of election tabulation systems, particularly focusing on Dominion’s voting machines. It highlights issues concerning the public assurance of accuracy in vote counting, and raises significant concerns prompted by specific incidents in previous elections.

**Key Findings**
The document notes that public tests, such as the Logic and Accuracy Test (LAT), are crucial to ensure the proper functioning of voting machines. However, it underscores discrepancies that emerged during the 2020 Election in Fulton County, Georgia, where Dominion had to conduct testing amidst complications posed by a COVID outbreak. This situation incurred significant expenses, totaling around $2 million, to ensure ballot counting accuracy.

**Controversies and Implications**
Additionally, the document outlines a notable incident during the 2022 primaries in Colorado, where electoral disputes arose following a machine recount that was scrutinized due to high rejection rates in preliminary testing. This has raised concerns over the integrity and reliability of election processes, particularly following the refusal of election officials to accommodate a hand recount as an alternative, despite clear evidence of issues with the original recount process.

**Conclusion**
Overall, this document sheds light on the challenges and complexities surrounding election tabulation systems, emphasizing the need for transparency and reliability in public testing and recount procedures to maintain trust in electoral processes. The ongoing debates reflect broader concerns regarding election integrity that continue to resonate in the political landscape.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/06/halderman-report-~dominion-machines–can-be-subverted-during/