Township Board: Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 5:30 pm (Correspondence)
Event Date: 2025-03-11
Summarized with ai model: gemini-2.0-flash-lite
Disclaimer: AI-generated summaries may contain errors. Please review the source document for accuracy.
This document provides a critical analysis of the Leelanau Township government’s unsuccessful process for approving a communications tower at 11015 N. Kitchen Road. The essay examines the three-year decision-making process, highlighting procedural flaws and offering suggestions for future policy changes. The proposal, initiated in 2022 to improve wireless coverage, was ultimately rejected by the Leelanau Township Planning Commission in February 2025, despite acknowledging the need for better cell service. The document emphasizes the project’s laudable goals while detailing shortcomings in communication, leadership, and adherence to zoning regulations.
The failure of the project stemmed from several key issues, including a lack of clear communication with neighbors, multiple changes in leadership at both the Township and County levels, and a part-time Zoning Administrator. The County, initially confident due to the Township’s support, faced intense public scrutiny and ultimately withdrew its initial application. The Planning Commission’s review process was also criticized for its strict interpretation of zoning standards and a lack of productive dialogue between the applicant and the commission. The ultimate denial of the application appears to have been influenced by the neighbors’ opposition.
The document suggests a need for revisions to the Township’s zoning ordinance. It points out that the Planning Commission applied excessively stringent interpretations of the standards. The author provides three examples of this, including the interpretation that removing 15 rows of cherry trees would have a significant impact on the surrounding orchard. Furthermore, the document emphasizes the importance of a more streamlined administrative process and a greater emphasis on providing public services.
Looking ahead, the author suggests that the Leelanau Township Board should engage in a “scoping process” to identify alternative tower locations and ensure a more transparent and inclusive process. The document concludes by stating that the Township’s commitment to providing better communication services should remain a priority, and it implies that the local elected officials would be supportive of another effort. The author stresses the need for changes to the zoning ordinance to reflect a more reasonable and commonsense approach.