Executive Board Session (Public Comment – R. Teahen, 1/14/2025)

Event Date: 2025-01-14

Summarized with ai model: grok-2-1212

Disclaimer: AI-generated summaries may contain errors. Please review the source document for accuracy.



The proposed Kitchen Road Cellular Communications Tower in Leelanau Township has been a contentious issue since its inception in January 2022. The project, initially spurred by the need for improved cellular and internet coverage during the COVID-19 pandemic, has faced significant criticism due to a lack of transparency, questionable motives, and inadequate public process. Despite the resolution’s original intent, the project has evolved into a plan for a 195-foot tower on a scenic ridge line above a wetland, which starkly contrasts with the existing 40-foot tower. The process leading to the pending special use permit has been criticized for lacking appropriate steps, accurate data, and factual representation, raising concerns about the project’s necessity and impact on the community.

The financial and ethical implications of the proposed tower are significant. The county and township have already committed funds to the project, yet the total construction costs are estimated to exceed $500,000, far more than currently allocated. There are no firm commitments from carriers to use the tower, and if they do, it could result in the relocation of equipment from the fire station tower, leading to revenue loss for the township while benefiting the landowner, Brian Mitchell, a member of the Planning Commission. The project’s ethical concerns are compounded by the potential personal gain for Mitchell, who would receive a new access road through a wetland at taxpayer expense. The high-pressure sales tactics used to push the project forward, citing essential emergency services, lack supporting data and raise further ethical questions.

The proposed tower also conflicts with the township’s zoning ordinances and master plan, threatening the integrity of these documents. The project’s location on a scenic ridge line and above a wetland is seen as a violation of the community’s commitment to preserving its natural environment. Alternatives to the tower, such as using existing structures or exploring other locations, have not been adequately considered. The lack of a comprehensive study to identify the best locations and the absence of a request for proposals from qualified landowners further highlight the project’s shortcomings. The community, including young residents like Elsie Purdy Teahen, is calling for a more transparent and inclusive process that respects the township’s values and considers the long-term impact on the area’s appeal to young families and its natural beauty.

Mackinac Island
Glen Arbor
Peninsula Township

Internal document reference #:1693

Similar Posts