Executive Board (Public Comment – B. Wiesner, 6/11/2024)

Executive Summary:

**Election Night Reporting (ENR) Manipulation:** This document alleges widespread manipulation of election results through the ENR process, which is the data broadcast on election night. The core argument is that ENR is not a real-time representation of vote tallies but rather a tool used to shape public perception and potentially influence election outcomes. The document cites instances of “F-Curves,” where vote counts for one candidate inexplicably surged, and “Edison Zeros,” where vote totals went to zero before significant shifts in vote distribution. https://joehoft.com/breaking-exclusive-a-shocking-analysis-of-election-night- reporting-and-the-companies-that-manufacture-election-results/

**Key Players and Technologies:** The document identifies Scytl, a Spain-based company, as a central player in ENR, collecting data and providing it to Edison Research, which then supplies data to news agencies. This creates a near-monopoly on what the public sees on election night. The analysis relies on the work of Draza Smith, who identifies a proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control algorithm in the ENR data, suggesting automated manipulation. The document links Scytl to Konnech, a company with alleged ties to China, raising national security concerns.

**Evidence and Anomalies:** The document presents evidence of manipulated data using anomalies in the data of the election night, by way of F-Curves, the Edison Zero, and “The Drop and Roll.” The swing states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania all exhibited an F-Curve after each had stopped counting at around 10 pm on November 3, 2020. The document details the examples of “The Drop and Roll” in Georgia, and Virginia, as well as county-level data, which demonstrates the algorithm.

**Consequences and Recommendations:** The document concludes that the ENR process is rigged, arguing that it is designed to deceive the American people. The document posits that elections can be modeled dishonestly and that “Plan B” was deployed, and argues that election officials are responsible for the accuracy of the ENR data. The document calls for a deeper investigation into the companies controlling the ENR data and their potential influence on elections.